Generally yes, specifics get complicated tho, for Jesus Saves Hockey Ugly Sweater, “I can’t serve you like I do everyone else, because your lifestyle is against my religion” even if the action itself does not in any way violate your religion. Which is a way of acting upon you can’t do that do that because it’s against my religion, while sounding like I can’t do that because it’s against my religion (obvious examples being the cake shop refusing to serve gay couples and the woman refusing to issue marriage licences to gay couples from her government position despite the law).
Jesus Saves Hockey Ugly Sweater, sweater, hoodie, and t-shirt
The bait and switch occurred years ago. Every single state constitution name drops God. Like, all 50 states. The idea was that our rights are inalienable and immutable because they’re God-granted and not state granted. That’s why the constitution was written in a way that specified that the government cannot take away those fundamental rights. Now, it’s not saying “the Christian God” is what grants rights, but rather “Whichever God you hold to Jesus Saves Hockey Ugly Sweater“. But the idea that religion and government were intended to be separated as a protection of government from religion is just patently false. It’s to protect the religion from government.
Best Jesus Saves Hockey Ugly Sweater
If the phrase was “One nation, under the Father, the Jesus Saves Hockey Ugly Sweater and the Holy Ghost”, I’d fully agree with your thoughts on the absurdity of it all. However, “Under God” is not specific with respect to which religion it “represents”. The word “God” doesn’t belong solely to Christians – no matter how much they’d like to think otherwise. Also, it has to be kept in mind the era in which it was added.